...We Welcome You To The Resverlogix HUB withIn The AGORACOM COMMUNITY!

Free
Message: Re: ACC 2019 Abstracts
4
Nov 27, 2018 12:02PM
2
Nov 28, 2018 08:40AM
2
Dec 05, 2018 09:34PM
3
Dec 05, 2018 11:22PM
1
Dec 17, 2018 12:23PM
2
Dec 17, 2018 12:32PM
3
Jan 02, 2019 11:23AM
2
Jan 16, 2019 10:44AM
4
Jan 24, 2019 10:05AM
2
Feb 05, 2019 01:29PM
4
Feb 05, 2019 04:54PM
5
Mar 04, 2019 11:58AM
3
Mar 04, 2019 12:06PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 03:40PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 04:56PM
3
Mar 04, 2019 11:04PM
2
Mar 04, 2019 11:30PM
3
Mar 16, 2019 08:06PM
3
Mar 18, 2019 02:48PM

Mar 18, 2019 02:54PM
2
Mar 18, 2019 04:05PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 12:10PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 12:18PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 01:21PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 01:25PM
4
Mar 19, 2019 02:36PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 02:45PM
4
Mar 19, 2019 03:24PM
2
Mar 19, 2019 04:09PM
3
Mar 19, 2019 05:39PM
4
Mar 19, 2019 07:31PM
3
Mar 20, 2019 11:48AM
2
Mar 20, 2019 12:10PM
1
Mar 21, 2019 11:59AM

"No, 99 is the median for the entire patient population. They have some very young patients on the trial as well, so that could be why there are folks with still highly functioning kidneys."

Pomp, thanks for continuing this discussion. You motivated me to brush up on eGFR. According to this poster from last year, they are using the Cockcroft Gault equation in BETonMACE to calculate the eGFR. It is based upon serum creatinine levels, and there is a handy calculator here and another one here in which you can plug in values for sex, age, weight, height, and creatinine levels and it will spit out the eGFR value.

Creatine Cleararance = Sex * [((140 - Age) /( Serum Creatinine in mg/dL))*(Weight in kg / 72 )]

Males have higher eGFR than females according to this calculator due to greater amount of muscle mass. For males, the sex value in the above equation is 1; for females the sex value is 0.85. Most patients in BETonMACE are male (75%). The youngest patient in BETonMACE is 31 (median 62), and eGFR declines with age. The creatinine levels for the entire BETonMACE population aren't reported to my knowledge; however, "normal" range for creatinine is 0.5 to 1.3 mg/dL. The eGFR value increases as the creatinine level goes down. One can get some pretty high eGFR values if one plugs in creatinine values below 0.5 mg/dL. The body weight of patients in BETonMACE hasn't been reported. But both EXAMINE and ELIXA had diabetic recent ACS patients. EXAMINE had a median body weight of 80 kg (176 lbs) with a range of 36 to 196 kg (79-432 lbs). ELIXA had a median body weight of 85 kg (187 lbs). The eGFR estimates increase with body weight and assumes mostly lean body weight. Therefore, the eGFR can be an overestimate in overweight and obese subjects if the weight is not corrected for fat mass.

So is a max eGFR of 599 mL/min/1.73m2 possible of by the Cockcroft Gault equation possible for BETonMACE as shown in the ACC poster earlier this week? Sure. A hypothetical 31 year old male who weighs 119 kg (262 lbs) with a creatinine value of 0.3 mg/dL would have an eGFR of 599 mL/min/1.73m2 not corrected for body weight. Or, a 31 year old male who weighs 180 kg (398 lbs) with a creatine value of 0.3 mg/dl would have an eGFR of 599 mL/min/1.73m2 even after correction for body weight.

I was previously skeptical of that 599 max eGFR value in the BETonMACE baseline measures, but now I understand how it may be possible.

BearDownAZ

 

3
Mar 21, 2019 05:54PM
2
Mar 22, 2019 06:52PM
2
Mar 23, 2019 08:14AM
2
Mar 26, 2019 10:44AM
2
Mar 26, 2019 02:00PM
3
Mar 26, 2019 03:23PM
4
Mar 26, 2019 04:12PM
1
Mar 26, 2019 04:17PM
3
Mar 26, 2019 06:37PM
4
Mar 26, 2019 07:55PM
2
Mar 26, 2019 10:36PM
3
Apr 02, 2019 01:50PM
6
Apr 18, 2019 11:39AM
5
May 10, 2019 04:43PM
3
May 13, 2019 03:40PM
5
May 20, 2019 12:18PM
4
May 22, 2019 06:33PM
1
May 22, 2019 08:33PM

May 22, 2019 09:05PM
1
May 22, 2019 09:21PM
5
May 22, 2019 10:40PM
2
May 23, 2019 10:05AM
7
May 29, 2019 02:47PM
6
May 30, 2019 05:02AM
2
May 30, 2019 02:34PM
2
Jun 04, 2019 10:12PM
3
Jun 10, 2019 04:59PM
4
Jun 10, 2019 08:27PM
1
Jun 10, 2019 10:18PM
2
Jun 24, 2019 02:15PM
1
Jun 24, 2019 03:03PM
1
Jun 24, 2019 05:28PM
7
Jun 26, 2019 09:25AM
4
Jun 26, 2019 10:00AM
3
Jun 26, 2019 10:34AM
7
Jun 26, 2019 11:00AM
2
Jun 26, 2019 05:18PM
5
Jul 01, 2019 08:38PM
1
Jul 01, 2019 09:37PM
2
Jul 02, 2019 01:00AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 08:33AM
2
Jul 02, 2019 08:43AM
4
Jul 02, 2019 09:42AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 10:26AM
1
Jul 02, 2019 10:32AM
6
Jul 02, 2019 10:44AM
4
Jul 02, 2019 12:13PM
3
Jul 02, 2019 12:27PM
4
Jul 02, 2019 01:03PM
5
Jul 02, 2019 02:28PM
3
Jul 02, 2019 02:34PM
2
Jul 02, 2019 03:23PM
4
Jul 18, 2019 04:12PM
6
Sep 16, 2019 03:11PM
1
Sep 16, 2019 03:46PM
2
Sep 16, 2019 04:04PM
2
Sep 16, 2019 04:11PM
3
Sep 17, 2019 06:13AM
3
Sep 17, 2019 10:04AM
4
Sep 17, 2019 10:34AM
7
Sep 17, 2019 10:55AM
5
Sep 17, 2019 11:04AM
1
Sep 17, 2019 11:34AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply