You're missing the point entirely here Narmac....I am not trying to stir up FUD.  What I am trying to do is to get the company to live up to its commitment in terms of being transparent in its corporate communications.  

I think if the company was more transparent, not just about this but a whole laundry basket full of items...then I believe its reasonable to assume there'd be more investor interest here and a higher share price.  What am I talking about?

-failure to disclose not attending announed events

-failure to notify when the FA and SSRA were put aside

-failure to meet expectations regarding forecasted announcments like licensing deals

-and on and on and on and on....if you want I can go through my old emails from the Clayton era.