dondon:

Your statements in defense of Connacher do nothing but give cover to what as is evidenced by the dilution of Connacher. Namely, the risky game Management has played in their capitalization, project mismanagement with Pod 1 which has been evidenced by the proudction shortcomings and reuired reegnineering and retrofits which have been required to Pod 1. The errors above cited have resulted in the massive expenditures required with subsequent dilution which the SP has suffered due to serious management errors. Such has been in excess of 100% of previous value. Perhaps you can give cover and understandng of turning a dollar into less than fifty cents. while management further dilutes every shareholder while it serves its interests through the provisions of their option shares being exempted from the effects of such dilution. I fail to see how any could interpret such a record to evince an exemplary performance record!

Brian