You really seem to be much more involved in this PTSC saga than I have thought before - otherwise there I see no reasonable explanation why a very busy attorney would engage in hypothetical and senseless discussions about alleged "existing" ten reasons for investing in a badly managed penny stock with a product nearly destroyed by the worldwide industry and only tiniest chances to recover from the repeated strokes of legal and financial powers if everyone knows there has never been more than one reason to invest in this penny stock other than its share of the MMP.

And this is no personal attack, but the truth, fact and a knowledgeable opinion.

As always you'll have the last word, I'll refrain from further commenting your further activities re: this topic.