Re: :UPDATED Opel refuses to do prior update on rule etc
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 08, 2013 04:03PM
Okay, We'll try this:
Here's your first response to me in a stock BB since about a year ago:
Me:
"Do you own any shares of OPEL?"
Zinc:
This "original position" can only mean the position you held back before your OPELF problems. The "Thursday" you refer to was Jun 27. There was quite a bit of action on OPELF that day as you cand see here (enter OPELF as the symbol) in my graphic below.
As I stated in the graphic, a total of 17500 shares of OPELF were bought/sold that day. But, only 11000 were bought/sold since - all at a loss. Furthermore, 2000 shares were sold on the 28th, the same day you said you re-established your position. I highly doubt you sold 2000 the day after you bought, for a loss, while telling the BB you re-established your position. It doesn't make sense.
But I want to give you the benefit of the doubt. Let's just say all of those shares sold after Jun 27 were yours. The value of these shares today is $4950. I didn't bother working out the exact value of all the trades because I don't care.
The point is after all the trouble you have caused, it turns out it was all over less than $5k. I don't know if I'm more mad at you or myself for bothering to debate the merits of the company, the tech or the stock with a max of 5K on the line.
And here you are trying to incite a class action law suit against OPEL. With whose money?!
And what are the damages exactly? I remember you sold at rock bottom, but with a pittance of an investment like 11000 (max) what did you lose when your shares were locked $2k?
Sheesh! Class action lawsuit. LOL.
Maybe I'll just send OPEL a copy of your posts implying they gained by locking up OPELF and see if they are feeling as litigious as you are.