Don: "Again, my opinion"

Careful Don. Someone might know "what you are and guessed at who you are in the past".

If Crystallex' data were worth anything wouldn't VZ have included it in their settlement agreement as they did with GRZ? Wouldn't Crystallex want everyone to know this? Wouldn't Tenor want shareholders to know this? Wouldn't the monitor/court require such a material disclosure be made to creditors?

It's a shame that some get comfort in conspiracy theories to the exclusion of logic (and evidence).

And talking of JJ, does he realise that even if Crystallex found $200m in other assets, Tenor would take 88% of that too, simply by converting their DIP share to equity? I hope this is simply ignorance but if so why insinuate I have any motive other than sharing information?